Alan Turing died at his home in Wilmslow, Cheshire, of cyanide poisoning. Wikipedia's account gives the date of death as June 7, 1954; the Turing Digital Archive at King's College Cambridge instead records "8 June 1954" — the day his housekeeper found him — which is why careful accounts describe the night as June 7-8 rather than picking one date. He was 41. A coroner's inquest that summer returned a verdict of suicide. Decades later, historians reopened the question, and it has never fully closed.
That's the answer people come looking for. What happened in the two years before it, and what's actually solid in the evidence afterward, is worth the extra few minutes.
Persecution first
In 1952, the British state arrested and prosecuted Turing for what the law then called "gross indecency" — the historical charge used against consensual sex between men, as the National Archives' guide to LGBT history records. Wikipedia adds the detail that decided the rest of his short life: Turing accepted a course of hormone treatment, sometimes called chemical castration, as the alternative to prison — choosing to keep working rather than lose two years to a cell. Framing the case in that legal language isn't an endorsement of it; it's the law that did the damage.
The apple by the bed
Turing's housekeeper found him dead in his bed, a half-eaten apple on the table beside him, per History News Network's account of the case. That detail became the visual shorthand for the story: cyanide, apparently self-administered and deliberate. The 1954 inquest agreed, and "suicide" is how the case has been repeated ever since.
Was it actually suicide?
Later scholarship complicates the tidy version. The historian Jack Copeland has argued, per that same account, that the evidence would not today be accepted as sufficient to establish a suicide verdict, and that Turing's death may equally probably have been an accident. No suicide note was ever found. The apple itself was never tested for cyanide, so nobody can say for certain it was the source rather than an ordinary, untouched apple sitting nearby. None of this proves an accident happened. It proves the inquest's certainty wasn't as solid as "verdict: suicide" makes it sound.
From a conversation with our Turing
An excerpt from a conversation with our AI Turing persona — a stylized recreation, honestly labeled, not a historical quotation. Our Turing's knowledge ends before that night in Wilmslow.
Caller: In 1952, you chose the treatment over prison. Why keep going at all?
Turing: Because the alternative was two years of not working, and I had rather a lot left to check. Machines take me by surprise with great frequency — that's not a complaint, it's the whole reason to stay at the bench. Prison doesn't let you stay at the bench. So I took the arrangement that did, whatever it cost the rest of me. I'm aware that sounds colder than it felt.
Redress, decades late
None of it reached him in time. Queen Elizabeth II granted Turing a posthumous royal pardon in 2013, per Wikipedia. In 2017, the Policing and Crime Act received royal assent on January 31 and automatically extended that pardon to an estimated 49,000 other men convicted under the same repealed laws — now informally called the Alan Turing law. In 2021, the Bank of England put his portrait on the polymer £50 note, timed to enter circulation on June 23, his birthday.
Ask him about the part he did see
Our Turing — an AI recreation, built from the historical record and labeled as what it is — can't describe that night in Wilmslow; his knowledge ends before it. But he can tell you about the two years that led there: the 1952 arrest, the choice he made, and the mathematical theory of biological pattern formation he was still working on. Ask him what "Can machines think?" looked like from inside a life the state was trying to shut down. Start the conversation whenever you're ready; he has time.
More in this cluster: Turing's verified quotes · his biography · fact file · back to the Turing hub.